|
Details on the Vioxx recall, what side effects are associated with Vioxx, Vioxx lawsuit and Vioxx attorney information...As you may know, Vioxx has been recalled by Merck, its pharmaceutical maker. Many persons that may have been harmed are looking for Vioxx lawsuit, Vioxx lawyer and Vioxx attorney information.
What side effects are associated with Vioxx ? What side effects are associated with Vioxx include weakness, nausea, itching or skin rash, swelling of the feet or ankles, unexpected weight gain, vomiting material that looks similar to coffee grounds, or blood in the stool or vomit.
Even more serious Vioxx side effects include swelling of the hands, face, lips, eyes, throat or tongue. Other side effects include difficulty swallowing or breathing, hoarseness, flu-like symptoms, sluggishness, yellowing of the skin or eyes, stomach pain, dark urine or pale stools or unusual fatigue. Once you know what side effects are associated with Vioxx, you may be interested in Vioxx lawsuit information.
Drug companies and physicians have the obligation to consumers the assurance that their medications are reasonably safe when used as intended. Before selling pharmaceuticals to the public, drug manufacturers are obligated to understand the drug's dangers and possible side effects. If a pharmaceutical company creates a dangerous drug by not properly researching its possible risks before placing it into the marketplace, harm may be caused to individuals taking the drug. Just because a drug has been approved by the FDA does not guarantee its safety and will not keep a drug manufacturer from being held liable. Seeking compensation against a drug manufacturer for loss or injuries caused by pharmaceuticals is the legal right of an injured consumer. And if the physician's conduct is to blame, a negligence suit for medical malpractice would be justified. The drug companies and physicians should expect that if their disregard for others safety causes damage, they will be held responsible. If you or someone you know may have suffered injury or damage related to Vioxx, consider seeking the assistance of qualified legal counsel.
The excellent article below describes what has happened.
Beyond Vioxx
by: Shane Ellison, M.Sc.
The dangers of Vioxx, manufactured by Merck, were discovered in 2000. The study known as VIGOR (Vioxx Gastrointestinal Outcomes Research) showed an increased risk of serious cardiovascular events, including heart attacks and strokes in patients taking Vioxx compared to patients taking naproxen. This early warning was ignored by prominent scientists within the FDA and Merck. A single attempt was made to warn the public about Vioxx. This attempt failed. Dr. David J. Graham, associate director for science in the FDA Drug Center's Office of Drug Safety, told Senate investigators that upon mentioning of the risks, he was "ostracized", "subjected to veiled threats" and intimidated by co-workers at the pharmaceutically controlled FDA. The success of Vioxx was the result of ghost writing among medical journals, drug company worship by both medical doctors and shareholders and million dollar marketing campaigns ($100 million per year) paid for by the drug manufacturer. Resultantly, the popularity of Vioxx and other NSAIDS gained surging momentum on the prescription drug marketing. The cold hard facts of science cannot be ignored forever.
The Wall Street Journal reported that Merck & Co.'s Vioxx eventually led to more than 27,000 heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths. Still, Merck's window of opportunity procured them $2.55 billion dollar annually. Vioxx is not the only non steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) problem child. It is estimated that 107,000 people are hospitalized every year for NSAID related gastrointestinal complications. Adding to this, at least 16,500 NSAID-related deaths occur each year among arthritis patients. This figure, as reported by Dr. Gurkirpal Singh, is comparable to the number of deaths from the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome [AIDS] and shows that NSAIDS contribute to as many deaths as multiple myeloma, asthma, and cervical cancer combined. These facts are shocking to a drug chemist like myself. Isn't the FDA supposed to protect the public from dangerous drugs? Shouldn't the American public be made aware of safe and effective natural alternative's? Apparently not, financial gains appear to be more important.
Because natural alternatives do not carry patent protection, drug manufacturers and the FDA will do little to promote them. Combination therapy serves as a poignant example - go here for article continuation on combination therapy alternatives to Vioxx. About the Author:
Shane holds a Master's Degree in Organic Chemistry and has first- hand industry experience with drug research, design and synthesis. He understands that Americans want and deserve education rather than prescriptions. His ebook surrounding cholesterol lowering drugs can be downloaded for FREE as a pdf file at www.health-fx.net - Combination Therapy. If problems with download, send email to services@healthmyths.net
References: http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/news/2004/NEW01122.html http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/08/26/health/main638721.shtml
Vioxx related articlesHormones and high cholesterol treatment to use. Naturally lowering cholesterol information. Symptoms of adult diabetes. Two foods should you reduce or avoid to help with weight loss?
|
